🔗 Share this article

For Natalia Molina and longtime Mexican American, the crowning moment of the World Series did not happen during the nail-biting finale on Saturday, when her squad executed multiple dramatic escape feat after another before prevailing in extra innings over the opposing team.

It came a game earlier, when two supporting players, Kike Hernández and Miguel Rojas, pulled off a electrifying, game-winning play that simultaneously upended numerous negative stereotypes touted about Latinos in the past decades.

The moment in itself was stunning: Hernández charged in from the outfield to catch a ball he initially misjudged in the stadium lights, then threw it to the infield to secure another, game-winning play. Rojas, at second base, caught the ball moments before a opposing player barreled into him, knocking him to the ground.

This wasn't just a remarkable athletic achievement, perhaps the key shift in momentum in the Dodgers' favor after looking for most of the series like the weaker team. To her, it was exhilarating, politically and culturally, a badly needed morale boost for the community and for the city after a period of enforcement actions, troops patrolling the neighborhoods, and a steady drumbeat of criticism from national leaders.

"Kike and Miggy presented this alternative story," explained the professor. "Everyone witnessed Latinos showing an contagious pride and joy in what they do, being leaders on the team, exhibiting a different kind of masculinity. They're bombastic, they're cheering, they're taking off their shirts."

"This represented such a contrast with what we see on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos thrown to the ground and chased down. It is so simple to be disheartened these days."

Not that it's entirely straightforward to be a Dodgers supporter these days – for Molina or for the legions of other Latinos who show up regularly to home games and fill up as many as half of the stadium's 50,000 seats per game.

The Complicated Connection with the Team

When intensified enforcement operations began in Los Angeles in June, and national guard troops were deployed into the area to respond to resulting protests, two of the city's sports clubs quickly released statements of solidarity with immigrant families – but not the baseball team.

The team president stated the organization want to stay away of political issues – a view influenced, perhaps, by the fact that a sizable minority of the supporters, including some Hispanic fans, are supporters of current leaders. After considerable external demands, the team subsequently committed $1m in support for families directly impacted by the raids but made no public condemnation of the administration.

Official Event and Past Legacy

Three months before, the team did not delay in agreeing to an invitation to mark their previous championship victory at the official residence – a decision that sports writers labeled as "disappointing … weak … and contradictory", considering the team's pride in having been the first major league franchise to break the color barrier in the mid-20th century and the frequent invocations of that history and the values it embodies by officials and present and past players. Several players including the coach had expressed reluctance to travel to the event during the first term but either changed their minds or gave in to demands from team management.

Corporate Ownership and Fan Dilemmas

An additional complication for supporters is that the Dodgers are controlled by a corporate behemoth, the ownership group, whose equity holdings, as per media reports and its own published financial documents, involve a share in a detention corporation that runs enforcement centers. The group's executives has said repeatedly that it aims to remain neutral of political matters, but its detractors say the inaction – and the financial stake – are their own form of acquiescence to current policies.

These factors contribute to significant conflicted emotions among Latino fans in particular – sentiments that emerged even in the excitement of this season's hard-won championship victory and the ensuing outpouring of team pride across the city.

"Can one to support the Dodgers?" area columnist Erick Galindo reflected at the start of the postseason in an thoughtful essay pondering on "Dodger blue in our veins, but uncertainty in our minds". Galindo was unable to ultimately bring himself to view the championship, but he still felt deeply, to the point that he believed his one-man boycott must have brought the squad the fortune it required to win.

Separating the Players from the Management

Numerous supporters who share similar misgivings seem to have decided that they can keep to back the players and its roster of global stars, featuring the Japanese superstar Shohei Ohtani, while pouring scorn on the team's business leadership. At no place was this more clear than at the championship parade at the home venue on the following day, when the capacity crowd cheered in support of the manager and his athletes but jeered the team president and the chief executive of the ownership group.

"The executives in formal attire do not get to claim our players from us," Molina said. "We have been with the team for more time than they have."

Past Context and Neighborhood Effect

The problem, however, goes further than just the team's present owners. The deal that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles in the late 1950s required the city razing three working-class Hispanic communities on a hill above the city center and then transferring the property to the team for a fraction of its actual worth. A song on a 2005 record that chronicles the events has an impoverished worker at the venue revealing that the home he lost to eviction is now third base.

Gustavo Arellano, perhaps southern California most widely followed Mexican American columnist and media personality, sees a darker side to the long, dysfunctional relationship between the franchise and its audience. He calls the Dodgers the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a business organization with an excessive, even harmful following by too many Latinos" that has been shortchanging its fans for decades.

"They've acted around Latino fans while picking their pockets with the other for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer wrote over the warmer months, when demands to boycott the organization over its absence of response to the enforcement actions were upended by the awkward reality that turnout at matches remained steady, even at the height of the protests when the city center was subject to a nightly curfew.

Global Stars and Community Bonds

Separating the squad from its business leadership is not a simple task, {